{"product_id":"vragen-25095-ik-werk-nu-4-jaar-bij-mijn-huidige-werkgever-heb-een-vast-contract-voor-16-uur-2-dagen-en-er-is","title":"Legal Advice on Flexible Working","description":"\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n I have been working for my current employer for 4 years now. I have a permanent contract, for 16 hours (2 days), and it was verbally agreed that I would work 1 fixed day and the other day is Wednesday or Friday. Now my employer wants me to work flexibly and that I will work 3 days at 5 hours per day. Is this allowed?\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e \nIn order to determine your rights and obligations, it is important to know, among other things, what is stated in your employment contract\/regulations\/collective labor agreement about changes in function\/conditions\/working hours\/location, etc.\n\n The general principle is that an employer may not change such a thing without the employee's prior consent.\n\n There are, however, exceptions:\n\n 1. If a unilateral amendment clause has been agreed, the employer does not need the employee's prior consent to amend the employment conditions. At least:\n\n •The amendment clause must be agreed in writing. The clause can be included in the employment contract, the collective labour agreement or a personnel guide that has been declared applicable.\n\n •The employer must have a weighty interest in the change, for example to avert possible bankruptcy or layoffs. And this employer's interest must outweigh the employee's interest, so that the employee's interest must yield.\n \n2. However, if no unilateral amendment clause has been laid down, there are still options for the employer.\n\n Case law shows that there are strict conditions:\n\n •There must be changed circumstances which provide sufficient reason to make a proposal to change the conditions;\n\n •The proposal must be reasonable, taking into account all the circumstances of the case.\n\n •The employee can reasonably be expected to accept the proposal.\n\n Whether the change is reasonable depends on, among other things:\n\n • The nature of the changed circumstances. A judge will more quickly consider a proposal reasonable if the employer can demonstrate that the company is experiencing serious business economic problems. An example is offering a lower position to prevent the employee from being dismissed.\n\n • The nature and significance of the change. For example, changing the function may be considerably more significant than abolishing a bonus.\n \n• The employer's interest. Major financial problems may constitute a legitimate interest, but increasing profits may not.\n\n • The employee's interest in not changing. In the case of a transfer, for example, a factor may be that the employee cannot travel far due to personal circumstances.\n\n • Is a reasonable phase-out arrangement possible?\n\n • Also check whether a collective labor agreement applies (no deviation from this is permitted) or whether a Works Council should be consulted.\n\n • And is the change collective or individual?\n\n So it is best to consult with an employment lawyer about your specific situation and circumstances. This is my specialty. Feel free to contact me without obligation.\n\n","brand":"Rechtswinkel.nl","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":55015156023645,"sku":"","price":0.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"url":"https:\/\/www.rechtswinkel.nl\/en\/products\/vragen-25095-ik-werk-nu-4-jaar-bij-mijn-huidige-werkgever-heb-een-vast-contract-voor-16-uur-2-dagen-en-er-is","provider":"Rechtswinkel.nl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}