{"product_id":"vragen-30055-beste-ik-woon-sinds-4-jaar-in-een-koop-appartement-kocht-er-ook-voor-10-000-euro-een-parkeerplaats","title":"Legal Advice Parking Lot and Trailer","description":"\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n Dear,\n I have been living in a purchased apartment for 4 years.\n Also bought a parking space for 10,000 euros. Chose a large space because this was possible at the time because I could also put a trailer on it. The place is not conveniently located with respect to the elevator. The broker who acted for the seller, sell-off and large owner helped with this and did not indicate to me that this was not allowed.\n There were several trailers in the garage. \nSince today, the major shareholder has a policy of returning to the initial situation: 1 car per spot: no trailers.\n I was almost ordered to remove my trailer on pain of being denied access.\n NB: All official documents state that a parking plate is required for parking a vehicle.\n However, this was not the situation I encountered and how the broker demonstrated it.\n Furthermore, the trailer does not pose a fire hazard and is not used for storing goods.\n\n Thank you for your attention and any response\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n If it concerns a closed parking space, the owner cannot now suddenly decide otherwise after the extension of the rights. (the fact that you could also place the trailer is part of the purchase agreement) It seems wise to me that you and the others make a strong effort to retain these spaces as they were actually sold and for a time the use, in deviation from the letters, is tolerated.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e \nUnfortunately I am still very much in the minority as owner and user of an open space in the garage, of course with a number and app index\n seller was not involved in the sale\n his agent informed me on his behalf\n all verbal of course :-(\n well I did choose and get a place that doesn't make sense\n (far from the elevator, but bigger, my story implicitly proves that I consciously chose a bigger one and actively worked on it.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n That doesn't matter; the broker acts on behalf of his client and all the information he provides you with is in principle at the expense of the client, the seller. But without written proof and other users, it does become a difficult story.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n and does it make any legal difference that the VVE has always tolerated the situation:\n at the time I bought the place, but also in the years after that there was never any performance! \nin fact, action was taken if there were loose items lying around, so the trailers and motorcycles were really well known,\n\n does the big owner (with majority of votes) have the right to deny me access to my place? or should he take some other action against me?\n\n Dear Monique and Rudolf,\n\n Thanks for your help. I don't have the deed of division (anymore).\n\n The general regulations state that 'A vehicle may be parked in the parking lot'.\n\n It is strange that the VVE will tolerate a car and a motorcycle.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n Yes, that certainly makes a difference, because it is part of the agreements that have become part of your rights of use, whether in writing or verbally or through actual action or inaction. However, the VVE can indeed vote against this use and then you will have to take action against the VVE's decision.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n Is there anything about this in the division regulations? If not, then in principle the VvE cannot prohibit you from using the parking space to park a trailer there.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e \nIt may also be of interest to you that, according to Article 1 RVV 1990, a trailer itself is also a vehicle: 'vehicles that are propelled by a vehicle or are clearly intended to be propelled in this way, as well as semi-trailers'.\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e\n\n Thanks for your help. I don't have the deed of division (anymore).\n The general regulations state that 'A vehicle may be parked in the parking lot'.\n It is strange that the VVE will tolerate a car and a motorcycle.\n\n","brand":"Rechtswinkel.nl","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":55014499483997,"sku":"","price":0.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"url":"https:\/\/www.rechtswinkel.nl\/en\/products\/vragen-30055-beste-ik-woon-sinds-4-jaar-in-een-koop-appartement-kocht-er-ook-voor-10-000-euro-een-parkeerplaats","provider":"Rechtswinkel.nl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}