{"product_id":"vragen-5469-kan-mijn-werkgever-mijn-verplichten-om-meer-uren-per-dag-te-gaan-werken-ik-werk-al-sinds-tijden-3","title":"Can your employer force you to work more hours?","description":"\u003ch4\u003e Questioner\u003c\/h4\u003e \nCan my employer force me to work more hours per day? I have been working 3 days 6 hours per day for a long time. Now my position is disappearing because they are going to centralize. Now they have told me that they have another (lesser) position for me but then I have to work other days, one of which is flexible. I now work three fixed days. I consciously chose my days off because I regularly have to go to the hospital with my daughter. Plus, to be able to better combine care, I work in my hometown itself, 6 hours per day. Now they want me to work outside my hometown, so extra travel time and work 8 hours per day, which means that I would not be able to pick up my daughter from daycare on time. Can they force me to work 8 hours per day now? They actually know that it is not feasible for moj because I am dependent on public transport. I have the feeling that they now hope that I will resign...\n\n\u003ch4\u003e Lawyer\u003c\/h4\u003e \nOnly in very exceptional circumstances may an employer require you to work more hours. As for other changes, it depends on various factors. The general principle is that an employer may not change employment conditions\/a function without the employee's prior consent. However, there are exceptions:\n 1. If a unilateral amendment clause has been agreed, the employer does not need the employee's prior consent to change the employment conditions. At least:\n •The amendment clause must be agreed in writing. The clause can be included in the employment contract, the collective labour agreement or a personnel guide that has been declared applicable.\n •The employer must have a weighty interest in the change, for example to avert possible bankruptcy or layoffs. And this employer's interest must outweigh the employee's interest, so that the employee's interest must yield. \n2. If no unilateral amendment clause has been laid down, there are also options for the employer.\n Case law shows that there are strict conditions:\n •There must be changed circumstances which provide sufficient reason to make a proposal to change the conditions;\n •The proposal must be reasonable, taking into account all the circumstances of the case.\n •The employee can reasonably be expected to accept the proposal.\n Whether the change is reasonable depends on, among other things:\n • The nature of the changed circumstances. A judge will more quickly consider a proposal reasonable if the employer can demonstrate that the company is experiencing serious business economic problems. An example is offering a lower position to prevent the employee from being dismissed.\n •The nature and significance of the change. For example, changing the function may be considerably more significant than abolishing a bonus. \n•The employer's interest. Major financial problems may constitute a legitimate interest, but increasing profits may not.\n •The employee's interest in not changing. In the case of a transfer, for example, a factor may be that the employee cannot travel far due to personal circumstances.\n • Is a reasonable phasing-out arrangement possible? Also check whether a collective labor agreement applies, or whether a possible works council must be consulted. And is the change collective or individual?\n I advise you to seek legal help. For example from one of the lawyers on this site\n\n","brand":"Rechtswinkel.nl","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":55019737252189,"sku":"","price":0.0,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"url":"https:\/\/www.rechtswinkel.nl\/en\/products\/vragen-5469-kan-mijn-werkgever-mijn-verplichten-om-meer-uren-per-dag-te-gaan-werken-ik-werk-al-sinds-tijden-3","provider":"Rechtswinkel.nl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}